朝陽科技大學 093學年度第2學期教學大綱
Landscape & Recreational Planning & Design(II) 景觀與遊憩規劃設計(二)

當期課號 7061 Course Number 7061
授課教師 羅清吉 Instructor LO,ROBERT C.
中文課名 景觀與遊憩規劃設計(二) Course Name Landscape & Recreational Planning & Design(II)
開課單位 建築及都市設計研究所碩士班一A Department  
修習別 必修 Required/Elective Required
學分數 5 Credits 5
課程目標 本課程係本所景觀與遊憩學程新進研究生之必修課程。針對生態性、永續性、社會性、文化性及休閒性等景觀環境相關課題,透過專案計畫之實地演練作深入探討,並藉由完成景觀遊憩計畫專案所必須涉及之制度決策、溝通、規劃、設計、執行等議題進行分析、討論與操作,以達致以下目的:1. 提升景觀遊憩專業素養 2. 培養溝通協調能力 3. 強化計畫控管能力 4. 落實理論於實務 Objectives The course is designed for graduate students of the Landscape & Recreation Division, Graduate School of Architectural & Urban Planning, as part of the compulsory courses. Focuses are placed on the landscape & recreational issues relevant to ecology, substainability, social and recreation. Through the exercise, students are asked to examine the problems thoroughly, analyse, discussion, and execute practically on decision-making, communication, planning, design & implementation. Objectives of the course are
1.heaving students’ professional capacity
2.cultivating students’ communication ability
3.strengthening students’ project management capability
4.fulfilling theories to practices
教材 1.王希智,2002,「綠建築」中「綠化」及「基地保水」評估指標於國民中小學校園之應用-以新竹市為例。
2.王鴻楷、楊沛儒,2001,地景生態城市規劃方法之初探-以「台北市主要計畫通盤檢討-綠色生態城市規劃案」為例。
3.王小璘、陳彥良,2002,以景觀生態學觀點探討都市生態網路之研究-以台中市為例。
4.王小璘、曾詠宜,2002,由景觀生態學觀點評估都市公園綠地區位之研究-以台中市東峰公園與豐樂公園為例。
5.王智聖,2002,都市公園生態空間特性之研究-以台南市公園鳥類為例。
6.王小璘、吳慧儀,2002,都市廊道景觀生態功能評估架構之研究-以台中市東光園道為例。
7.王小璘、劉若瑜,2001,由生態設計觀點評估都市基質之研究-以台中市東區及南屯區為例。
8.吳庭羽,2001,綠化資材循環管理維護及資源化處理之研究。
9.洪得娟,2000,都市生態綠網模式建構與發展之可能性。
10.郭瓊瑩、王秀娟,1999,台灣地區鄉鎮市公園綠地系統發展模式建立之研究。
11.張俊彥,2000,以塊區(patch)形狀進行公園綠地評估之應用研究。
12.黃士瑋,2002,四生環境共生國土評估體系與綜合指標之研究。
13.蔡厚男、蔡淑婷,1999,從開放空間系統到景觀生態網絡—以國立台灣大學校總區校園為例。
14.Allesina, Stefano & Cristina, Bondavalli, 2003, Steady state of ecosystem flow networks: a comparison between balancing procedures, ecological modelling, 165: 221-229.
15.Bueno, Juan Antonio; Tsihrintzis, Vassilios Andrew & Alvarez, Leonardo, 1995, South Florida greenways: a conceptual framework for the ecological reconnectivity of the region, Landscape and Urban Planning, 33: 247-266.
16.Burns, Catherine M.; Kuo, Johnson & Sylvia Ng, 2003, Ecological interface design: a new approach for visualizing network managemen, Computer Networks, 43: 369-388.
17.Cook, Edward A., 2002, Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks, Landscape and Urban Planning, 58: 269-280.
18.Edward, A. Cook, 2002, Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks.
19.Jongman, R.H.G., 1995, Nature conservation planning in Europe: developing ecological networks.
20.Nilsson, J., Bjuggren, C.& B. Frostell, 1998, Greening of a campus restaurant at Stockholm University sustainable development audits by means of the SDR methodology.
21.Paterson, D. & K. Connery, 1997, Reconfiguring the edge city: the use of ecological design parameters in defining the form of community.
Teaching Materials  
成績評量方式 依校方規定辦理+教師所訂規範(如出席率、Q & A、作業、上課表現等) Grading Univ's regulations + Professor's rules (e.g. attendance, Q & A, submission, notes, presentation…etc)
教師網頁  
教學內容 1.相關理論探討與應用2.方法流程建構3.全程及階段性進度研擬4.溝通技巧與執行5.可行性分析6.個案研究7.專題研究8.規劃設計9.成果報告撰寫與製作10.公展製作 Syllabus 1.Study and Application of Theories & Methods 2.Formulation of Study Flowchart 3.Planning the Schedule 4.Communcation and Excursion 5.Feasibility Analysis 6.Case Studies 7.Special Studies 8.Planning & Design 9.Writing the Research Paper 10.Public Exhibition
尊重智慧財產權,請勿非法影印。